E0 NULL / E2 SYNTHETIC BENCHMARK · Assumption: calibrated/whitened 5×5×5 complex I/Q. Falsifier: prespecified controls match or exceed Casimir performance on the same benchmark.
E47 · KKP-RADAR · MC-E47-RADAR-BRIDGE-20260927-001

E47 × KKP-RADAR
Spectral Operator Bridge

A calibrated 5×5×5 complex I/Q radar patch is vectorized directly into the existing 125-dimensional spin-2 triple tensor carrier. The unchanged E47 Casimir decomposition then produces seven measurable shell populations, an E47 occupancy, kernel residuals, and a calibrated anomaly statistic.

125complex radar samples
47E47 projector rank
0.376isotropic-null E47 mean
PASSfinite bridge certificate

Operator chain

X(a,r,t)=I+iQ,  a,r,t∈{-2,-1,0,1,2}
        ↓ vec
x ∈ C^125 ≅ V₂⊗V₂⊗V₂
        ↓
C = Jx² + Jy² + Jz²
        ↓
K = (C−6I)(C−30I)
        ↓
Pj , j=0…6
        ↓
qj = ||Pj x||² / ||x||²
        ↓
ηE = q₂ + q₅
AE = (q−μ₀)ᵀ Σ₀⁺ (q−μ₀)
Exact radar identity. For isotropic calibrated complex noise, E[ηE] = Tr(PE)/125 = 47/125 = 0.376. This is a null occupancy expectation, not an anomaly threshold.

Why seven shells, not one scalar?

The exact isotropic baseline is (1,9,25,28,27,22,13)/125. The full Casimir-shell vector records how radar energy redistributes across all irreducible sectors. In the synthetic benchmark it carries substantially more information than scalar deviation of E47 occupancy alone.

SNRCasimir 7-shell AUCrandom same-size splitsFFT peak / total energy|ηE−0.376| AUC
−10 dB0.5390.491–0.5130.6230.501
−5 dB0.6950.486–0.5060.9040.534
0 dB0.8660.476–0.5160.9960.634
+5 dB0.9320.466–0.5171.0000.696
Control result. Five Haar-random orthogonal decompositions with the same dimensions (1,9,25,28,27,22,13) remain near chance at every SNR, while the Casimir seven-shell profile is above all five controls. The standard 3-D FFT peak-to-total-energy statistic is stronger than the Casimir profile at every tested SNR. At 0 dB: 0.996 vs 0.866. This is a comparative synthetic benchmark, not evidence of operational radar superiority.

Contraction

Tε = I − εK²
ε* = 1/99144
ρ* = 15/17
lim n→∞ Tε*ⁿ = PE

220-step relative error = 6.27e−13
||PE²−PE||F = 6.59e−15
||KPE||F = 1.82e−12
null Monte Carlo mean = 0.375602
exact null mean = 0.376

Composite KKP-RADAR vector

existing branch:
X → ρ → Ω → κ → φ

parallel E47 branch:
X → vec(X) → {q0,…,q6}, ηE, RK, AE

fusion:
zRADAR-E47 =
[ρ, Ω, κ, φ, SNR, Doppler,
 q0,…,q6, ηE, RK, AE]

Certificate PASS. Exact finite algebra and synthetic numerical bridge validated.

Evidence boundary: no measured operational radar performance is claimed. Random same-size subspaces and the FFT peak/total-energy control are now recorded in the machine certificate; the FFT control wins on this synthetic benchmark. The next empirical gate is a measured/public complex I/Q benchmark against prespecified full CFAR, Doppler-threshold, and supervised baselines.